Stinky flag

  • Rating: 7.3

Reviews and comments

    DarkSonic Posted more than 20 years ago

    8

    Ok, I am the first reviewer I think.
    First impressions: This is a level by Satan[si], and it is his first CTF level. Let’s review it, shall we?

    Gameplay: Good. The gameplay is good, but it’s nothing special. There are some springs and one ways, also some vines which is good enough to make the gameplay average. The level is almost symmetrical, but some places were a bit different.

    Eye Candy: Good/Very Good. The eye candy is nice, there are maybe some places that lack alot of eye candy, but I can say I like the eye candy here.

    Pickup placement: Good/Very Good. This is also nice, there was good ammo placed in small groups. That’s quite nice, I think. There are 3 Power-Ups, and I think they are nice placed. The RF PU is in the center, with a Full Energy above it. The Bouncy PU is at the left side, and there is a Toaster PU at the right side. This is quite nice. There is enough ammo in the level, so it is nice.

    Others:
    Host this: sometimes.
    Download: sure.

    My rating is a 7.5. Good work, Satan, and it’s a nice first CTF level.

    Did you think this was a good review? Yes/No

    Ðx Posted more than 20 years ago

    8
    Hmm I like it! (

    DUH

    Eyecandy

    Is’t bad! i like it
    some woter and the bases on
    woter ( eva dont get wet :P )
    Anyway good.

    Ammo/goodies/Other

    Not bad placed. only the RF is in the middel, i dont care :P
    Not bad

    size/originally/gameplay/or/like/that

    Size is small but i wont take
    points of it :P
    The gameplay is’t bad the music fits good anyway!

    Host this: Yes
    Download reccomed; yes

    A 7.7

    Ðx

    Did you think this was a good review? Yes/No

    Niels aka ChippieBW Posted more than 20 years ago

    7

    Level: Stimky Flag
    By: Satan

    EYECANDY:
    Quite good. You used the correct tiles and good background/foreground layers. Correct, except the one-way sewers that are frustrating (you can’t buttstomp them)

    AMMO:
    Good placement, no seeker powerup, quite good. Ammo is placed good, not too much, not too less. Enough powerups.

    LEVEL STRUCTURE:
    Reasonable. The base placement looks like Zaitox, except the fact that you cant see the bases in one view. Bases are underground, and you have to get upperground to get to them. Quite original.

    GAMEPLAY:
    Reasonable/good. Sometimes a little bit frustrating, if you go next to a wall you might stick to it. Advice: Sta in air. Also some important passages you can’t see.

    ————
    RATINGS:
    ————

    Score: 7.2
    Download: Yes
    Host: A few times, maybe a good new CTF level.

    Did you think this was a good review? Yes/No

    blurredd Posted more than 20 years ago

    7

    Well, the name is… something else…

    GAMEPLAY:

    The balance is mostly good from what I can tell. The flow isn’t bad, but it’s not too Jazz-friendly. I can’t say I like the overall layout, though. The gameplay seems too basic, and I wouldn’t use the top half of this level too often because of where the start positions are located. The borders around the level could be a little thicker as well.

    EYE CANDY:

    It’s pretty much typical Colonius eye candy. Nothing new, although nothing horrible either. The masking should have been checked, but otherwise the eye candy is average.

    CARROT AND AMMO PLACEMENT:

    The full energy carrot and the RF powerup are placed near the bottom where the bases are. Not placing both of those so close to the fastest base route would be better in that it would reduce some of the chaos of this level. The other powerups placed on opposing sides are fine. Ammo placement is decent, despite the cluster of ammo above the carrot. It seems to be too much variety in one spot.

    HOST THIS OFTEN?

    Maybe once if bored. I don’t like this level enough to give it anything higher, so 6.7 it is.

    Did you think this was a good review? Yes/No

    SuckaTube Posted more than 20 years ago

    WOW!

    (Rating removal. -Trafton)[This review has been edited by Trafton AT]