4
Now zen,
FILE TYPE: Tileset
COLOUR:
Ouch, thats bright. The light blue backround doesn’t give the tileset a cityish atmosphere. The colour for the sprite tiles is OK though.
RATING: 5.6
DRAWING STYLE:
Not good. The ground isn’t even and the backround came out of the trash. If you tried your best to make a level out of this, it would be hard to make it fit.
RATING: 2.8
TILES:
There is not enogh tiles to make this work. There is not enough tiles for eyecandy or makeing gameplay out of this.
RATING: 3.2
ANIMATION:
Surprisingly, I don’t see how any tiles could be animated.
DEDUCTION: 0.5
BONUS:
EXAMPLE LEVEL:
The tileset is under 4. Therefore, the example level makes not a great impression.
+0
0.5 Point bonus since its your first tileset.
AVERAGE RATING: 3.7
DEDUCT: 0.5
BONUS: 0.5
FINAL RATING: 3.7 (3.7)
RANK: 3 Very Bad
DOWNLOAD?: NO
FINAL COMMENT:
I would try again.
home32
13 Jul 2006, 02:34 (edited 13 Jul 06, 09:46 by Cooba)
The Reviewers are right YET!.
I kinda like it yet its not THAT! good.
I give it a 5
[Rating (5) clearance. Please provide more supportive information in your reviews. ~Cooba]
THIS LEVEL WAS EXTREMELY COOL.
EYECANDY: it was extremely good for the optins in the tile set.
Drawing style:This had an intestering color and style to it that i realey enjoyed
Tiles: Were extremely good even though thre were not many.
Adimation: Very good detail and wonderful signs.The adimation was just extreme
Music:The music was the best of all.If the music wondn’t have being so good i would have rated this level 4.5
[Unsupported rating (10) removal. Please. The music really doesn’t count for ~ 65% of the rating. You can’t rate a level you consider bad this way just because of the music. Also, your reasons for rating just lack. You say you like the level yet you wish to rate 4.5. It would be good if you would think a bit more about your reviews. – FQuist]