Tubelectric Remix (DJ Insectdroid)

  • Rating: 6.1

Reviews and comments

    Haze Posted more than 20 years ago

    4

    Is this an April Fool’s joke? I do not claim to be a numero uno tracker either but I agree with Aiko that it’s too much NOT a remix, “merely” some beat-track slapped onto it. Not very original IMHO, even my own remixes of JJ(2) songs are better (I’ll post something soon if you don’t believe it).
    A 4 for the idea and the effort. Only download if you’re collecting this stuff… Come on Insectdroid, I know you can do better than THIS!

    Almost forgot to post some constructive critizism:
    - Don’t just increase the speed, some pitchbends are way off now
    - Don’t plain slap on a beat, use instruments that fit you and the style of the song and/or fiddle in some nice new tracks
    - Make it sound “whole”, as mentioned many times before, it now sounds as a (rock-)song with a seperate (rave-)beat under it. No good, amigo
    - The only good parts where the intro-fx and the actual beat, put some focus on original melodies or instruments

    If you’d excuse me, my head is starting to ache…

    Did you think this was a good review? Yes/No

    ShanD Posted more than 20 years ago

    6

    I’ve had this off TraxInSpace for a while, and I liked the added beat, and I wanted a file I could play in JJ2. And my prayers have been answered! Sure, not much is added, but what is added was great!

    This is a short review. It has less impact on the upload's score.

    Hawkin 87 Posted more than 20 years ago

    6

    The only real difference I noticed was that it was faster(and had a few sound fx added). You can do a bit better that that…

    Hawkin 87 :-\[This review has been edited by Hawkin 87]

    This is a short review. It has less impact on the upload's score.

    Stijn Posted more than 20 years ago

    6

    I don’t like it very much, but a 6.0 for the idea (who ever edited a song?)

    P.S. To Aiko, why you said to the admins they must delete a track when i added it to the download database? Why? And why you don’t say that to Wakeman also?

    This is a short review. It has less impact on the upload's score.

    tazar Posted more than 20 years ago

    8

    Good music, but not better than original version!

    This is a short review. It has less impact on the upload's score.

    Quo-Avek Posted more than 20 years ago

    2

    Remix? All that’s changed is the Speed of the song and the Breakbeat Boom Boom Boom.

    There’s nothing orriginal about it. =p

    This is a short review. It has less impact on the upload's score.

    Reblik Posted more than 20 years ago

    9

    Very cool, I needed some new music files. Umm… not much to say about it so Ill just say the rating speaks for itself

    This is a short review. It has less impact on the upload's score.

    The Trasher Posted more than 20 years ago

    9

    I like it.

    This is a short review. It has less impact on the upload's score.

    progenitor_caretaker Posted more than 20 years ago

    8

    It’s about time someone made something like this. I’ve always pictured both JJ1 and JJ2 tubelectric going toghether in one. I think I’ll even use this for another TubElectric level.

    However, I do agree with some other guys here. Thx WakeMan

    This is a short review. It has less impact on the upload's score.

    SSS Alegzander Posted more than 20 years ago

    6

    I think,so re-mix should be more the more than fasting track, but TubeElectric is good and cannot be destroyed by remix.

    This is a short review. It has less impact on the upload's score.

    Scizor CT Posted more than 20 years ago

    4

    Ya know, this reminds me a lot of the Diamondus remix I just reviewed, and it’s pretty much the same basic thing. Double the tempo, and throw in drums. At least he did a little more with the track than this.

    For the record people, this DOES NOT MAKE A REMIX.

    Did you think this was a good review? Yes/No

    Ðx Posted more than 20 years ago

    9

    Waaaaaaaaah my ears!

    great for levels wakeman!

    great great great!

    an 8.5 from me!

    This is a short review. It has less impact on the upload's score.

    DanYjel Posted more than 20 years ago

    4Not recommended:

    WooHoo! Techno Mix of Tubelectric! I must enjoy this piece…

    So not. We have faster original piece with some new nice techno beats. Nothing more.

    Faster tempo here just sucks, beats are fairly good, but something is missing… Arrrgghh… No hi-hats… Just beat – snare – beat – snare. That “fairly” is not enough. Firstly I thought this could be good for technophiles, but no. I like techno too, very much, but this is bad.

    (+) Fairly good new beats
    (-) without hi-hats
    (-) Faster tempo does not sound well
    (-) Nothing else changed.

    Maybe there will be found somebody who will like this mix… But I can’t recommend it to download, that was reckless…

    Did you think this was a good review? Yes/No

    JohnM Posted more than 20 years ago

    Was this really Fquist or (the|another) hacker?

    aiko Posted more than 20 years ago

    Wakeman, could you create an account for AstroniA or let her/him create one? Then re-post it?

    Well, anyways, i don’t like this “re-mix” too much. I admit, i never was the module composer #1 in town but from what i hear the author didn’t “re-mix” the whole song too much. It’s just one very techno orientated (BEAT!BEAT) track added. Not my favourite style of tracking, sorry. I won’t rate it in any case, because it wasn’t made by Wakeman (who posted it). It’d probably get 6 or 7 points from me.

    Did you think this was a good review? Yes/No

    jazzgal 26 Mar 2006, 01:07 (edited 26 Mar 06, 01:45 by Fquist)

    i dont know about u guys but i love it

    [Inappropiate rating (10) removal. Will you please check out our rules before rating? Your review violates the rules – FQuist]

    Evil Hare (aka) General 29 May 2006, 13:48 (edited 29 May 06, 19:30 by Violet CLM)

    This isn’t a proper remix. Just faster and an extra sample added. It was quite loud too so i just stopped after 5 seconds.
    (Unsupported rating (3) removal. How can you TELL if you only listened to five seconds? ~Violet)