Review by Odin314

Posted:
8 Nov 2008, 16:20
For: Damntest
Level rating: 5.2
Rating
N/A

It’s called “Damntest” because that’s what you say after noticing someone released another TSF test.

Quick Review by master sven

Posted:
8 Nov 2008, 12:34
For: Damntest
Level rating: 5.2
Rating
1.7

I think, so I am.
Sux.

Quick Review by XÐxP

Posted:
8 Nov 2008, 11:40
For: Damntest
Level rating: 5.2
Rating
8.7

I think, cool.

RecommendedQuick Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
8 Nov 2008, 10:11 (edited 8 Nov 08, 10:11)
For: TITLED Deux
Level rating: 7.7
Rating
7.7

Very fun level, but a little too gimmicky for my tastes.

RecommendedQuick Review by Neo-->

Posted:
8 Nov 2008, 09:35 (edited 8 Nov 08, 09:52 by cooba)
For: Enter the Chaos
Level rating: 8.2
Rating
8.2

heh
Chaotic ye ye this it ;)
but the rain falls upwards this a little bit strange
and on the bottom of the orbit the speeding bushes do not like but otherwise nice level ;)
I give you 8.2 for him

[Review changed to quick review. – cooba]

Not recommendedQuick Review by Neo-->

Posted:
8 Nov 2008, 09:20 (edited 8 Nov 08, 09:52 by cooba)
For: Training level for JDC
Level rating: 2.6
Rating
1

uhh…
this terrible lvl…
there are too many weapons, fastfire and power-ups. and the background..
I do not talk about it.
The 7 extremes overrate!This level more 1

[Review changed to quick review. – cooba]

RecommendedReview by PT32

Posted:
8 Nov 2008, 02:41
For: TITLED Deux
Level rating: 7.7
Rating
7.9

This is a very nice level. A little hard in parts, but very creative nonetheless.

Intro

TITLED Deux is a CTF level, set on an action-packed space station with an agreeable song, well-placed eyecandy and more. The added fact of a version with and without pits only makes it look even better.

Setting/quality

As I explained before, it’s on a space station. It’s not 100% symmetrical, but does have a familiar rhythym to it. Some areas were brighter or darker than others, which added more fun value. I didn’t like how easy it is to memorize the routes, however clever they were. Which they were.

Buggyness/likeability

No real findable bugs that I ascertained, which is nice. I liked how the combination of springs, floatups, and freezing-device-thingamabobs was used to propel you from one part of the base to another. However, the seekers were a bit camper-friendly, which is sad.

Music and miscellaneous junk

The music fit well [razor-ub.it]. It had kind of a futury, spacey feel to it. Exactly the kind I had in mind.
This level runs smooth in TSF, and could work in 1.23 with + [although I haven’t tested yet, it doesn’t appear to have any TSF+-exclusive events]. Yay!

Straight talk to the reader

So, what more could I possibly say? Good work, and bring us some more later? Well I was kind of going to say that, but let’s lavish a bit of praise on the end…
In short, TD is a very well done level with a few minute flaws, but hardly enough to tear it down incredibly far. Dl this now.

RecommendedQuick Review by Hammer

Posted:
7 Nov 2008, 16:25 (edited 7 Nov 08, 16:58 by cooba)
For: Heaven v.1.1
Level rating: 9.6
Rating
10

In my opinion, the best tileset ever.
I just love the way you made the clouds and there is lots of eyecandy you can use, unbelivable.

The Jazz statues with the flame are just perfectly made.

You really deserve a 10!

[Review changed to quick review. – cooba]

RecommendedQuick Review by FawFul

Posted:
7 Nov 2008, 14:28 (edited 7 Nov 08, 16:57 by cooba)
For: TITLED Deux
Level rating: 7.7
Rating
7.5

very kewl usage of this tileset.
the layout is pretty massive and lollish, with a shield in the middle down for nubs who think they can take it.it’s simple but funny in some ways. in other words; This level is very BOOM BOOM MUSIC :S!.. and that’s my 1337 copyright! damn right son.

download reccomendation, and i will play this as a child :M

Review by Hammer

Posted:
6 Nov 2008, 19:31 (edited 6 Nov 08, 22:07 by cooba)
For: the house of doom
Level rating: N/A
Rating
N/A

Sorry dude, im not going to rate this level.

It really is pretty bad, learn some mapping before wasting J2O’s bandwidth.

Good luck mapping, -Hammer

[This zip file is 6.55 kB big. Not even a 56k user would complain here I think? ~cooba]

Not recommendedReview by Technopauluz

Posted:
5 Nov 2008, 22:55
For: Winter Dreams: the 4-in-1 multiplayer pack
Level rating: 4.9
Rating
4.5

It’s well known that the Holiday Hare 98 tileset has nice eyecandy but is terrible masked and is difficult to use. I see that you give it some try but there is missing some creativety and skill. If u work on it you really can make better levels.

I am currently working on a battle level and using this tileset to. (2nd time) It cost a lot of time to get the best out of this set and make a nice unique battle ;)
If u like i can send you some screenshots.

Things to mention:

- The spring on 13, 56 isn’t jazz friendly…
- The layers 5, 3, 2 are not used very well…
- Get more Ammo in the game
- The masking is bad (partly tnx to epic)
- Lot’s of more…

As tip I can give u to download some levels that used this set to (like mine old level ;) )for some example you might learn a lot of it :D

Succes!

Quick Review by n00b

Posted:
5 Nov 2008, 22:45 (edited 6 Nov 08, 15:02 by cooba)
For: QBA Pack
Level rating: N/A
Rating
N/A

All I can say is
SHOOOOT THEN BOOOOOOM! Then you are a winner :)”

Amazing.

[Rating (10.0) clearance. – cooba]

Review by cooba

Posted:
4 Nov 2008, 19:38 (edited 4 Nov 08, 19:39)
For: New Diamondus
Level rating: 7.2
Rating
N/A

FawFul: There’s nothing absurd about Stijn’s review. He’s entitled to have an opinion about your work, and to defend it. Just as you are entitled to disagree with his rating and his arguments. However, you’re overreacting. I don’t see how did you infer hostility from Stijn’s review – your comments about personal attacks and distrust are out of place here.

Master Sven: Please don’t jump into the gray area of public debate.

Certain people: Please do remember that downrating a review just because you disagree with the rating is wrong. Like Stijn said, read the review first, and think about what you’re doing. Grytolle, who took time to read through Stijn’s review (even if he still downvoted), is a good example.

I want this mess to cease, starting now. I don’t want to see this kind of situation to happen again, so please let us cooperate.

Review by darkyb

Posted:
4 Nov 2008, 15:22
For: QBA Pack
Level rating: N/A
Rating
N/A

well these lvl’s are not very good keep working on JCS to improve.

Also i see an interesting thing on the QBA2 P2 lvl:
-it seems when a lvl is 15×500 the ground give the mirage that moves.A cool stuff;D

Review by Grytolle

Posted:
4 Nov 2008, 14:12 (edited 4 Nov 08, 14:13)
For: New Diamondus
Level rating: 7.2
Rating
N/A

i did read before downrating stijn’s review… i don’t see why other tilesets than the original would be relevant for the rating of this one

for the rest i think the screenshots look cool, but i won’t review since i don’t make levels anyway.. maybe that’s why i don’t see why it would have been good to reorder the tiles either

RecommendedReview by PT32

Posted:
4 Nov 2008, 04:24
For: OLO Fanolint Level
Level rating: 7.4
Rating
7

This is a cool level.
OLO’s fanolint level is made indeed with the Sonicnathan 1 tileset, a file curiously unreleased to J2O but of fairly nice quality. Music is JJ1 accurate, buggage is low.
I didn’t like the large amount of baddies in the level. This unfortunately seems to be a recurring trend among most jazz1 level aspirations, another of which is a depressingly small amount of singular eye candy. The level had a good style, but seemed to have a large amount of pickups.
In short I liked it, but there are [as always] some things to go back and fix up a bit. Dl rec, cause I’m feeling generous.

Review by PT32

Posted:
3 Nov 2008, 23:07 (edited 5 Nov 08, 21:48)
For: Winter Dreams: the 4-in-1 multiplayer pack
Level rating: 4.9
Rating
N/A

EDIT:
Okay, I guess you were right. In some ways…
I fixed up most of those things you pointed out to me. =)

Review by PurpleJazz

Posted:
3 Nov 2008, 20:45
For: Winter Fallz
Level rating: 4.1
Rating
N/A

Just wondering, is this level an entry for my contest?

Not recommendedReview by Stijn

Posted:
3 Nov 2008, 08:55 (edited 4 Nov 08, 13:31)
For: New Diamondus
Level rating: 7.2
Rating
3.5

This is yet another Diamondus edit with yet another set of new palettes and yet another rearrangement. Basically it contains most tiles the IC edits of Diamondus add and then some, but in another tile configuration, making it impossible to use these sets to “upgrade levels” using that – practically standard – edit.

The new tiles are put throughout the tileset randomly at places that used to be empty. I’d have preferred to see either a total rearrangement (as this breaks backward compatibility anyway) or at least the new tiles in a logical order and arrangement. The new tiles are basically a pitch black layer 4 background tile and corresponding stuff-with-black-background tiles and some versions of the vegetation tiles with a blue background. There’s some waterfalls too but those are also in other Diamondus edits and are ripped anyway so I don’t really see that as something to recommend this set for.

Then there’s the palette edits. One is obviously based on a Diamondus ß palette (or maybe it has been used before, it looks awfully familiar at least); the other one is dark with red sky and water. There’s no example levels so I can’t really judge but as far as I can see the combination isn’t that pretty and a more subtle contrast (or also adding red tones to the other tiles) would’ve worked better.

In summary this tileset edit is minor at best and does not offer any advantages over already existing Diamondus edits. The palette edits are not that interesting and the tile arrangement doesn’t work that well either. You’re better off using one of the other Diamondus-based sets out there.

edit: in response to those who apparently can’t take it if I write a well-argumented review that doesn’t happen to give a high rating: how about actually reading my review before wrecking the helpful index :)

RecommendedReview by PT32

Posted:
3 Nov 2008, 05:04 (edited 4 Nov 08, 21:10)
For: New Diamondus
Level rating: 7.2
Rating
7

I didn’t quite share Master Sven’s enthusiasm for this set. It was, I’ll admit, a fairly good remake of the set. An extra cave type [really just a black wall bg], some modified trees, a couple added tiles here and there, it’s basically just a re-edit of the orig Diamondus palettes upload [also done by Faw, I believe, good job on that one…].
Nothing much notable about this one, except maybe the nice color variations and minimal buggage. No music was used, in fact no example level was used at all either! This strikes me as unusual.
So in summary, I liked this a lot. Not certainly enough for an 8, but I liked it. Positive DL rec, I guess. :) Oh, and a 7.0 rating.
EDIT
I did read Stijn’s review! And I hold no grudge against him for it. I just don’t happen to agree with his opinion…

  1. 1
  2. 251
  3. 252
  4. 253
  5. 254
  6. 255
  7. 256
  8. 257
  9. 258
  10. 259
  11. 1290