This is good, but i dont think it should get a rating. With this file you can:
1) Use ASCII characters
2) color your name
3) Serverlist stuff
You would say: “Another test. Bleh…”, but this is not a test like that. You could improve the eyecandy, though… There are some tests witch are easy, very hard, and normal. At the end there is a test u cant play out. If you’re Spaz and you get in, you CANT get out. You have to walk over a racing line witch goes very fast! The problem is that it goes TOO FAST!! Spaz wont be able to get out there, so thats not very nice. But the rest is okay. Nice tube-background. You did work on this test. On some places you can get hurt…(.)And thats stupid: You have a test witch need weapons to get out. TNT bouncers RF… But if you didn’t get enough TNT at the first, and you get in another lvl like this, you cant get out! Your TNT is on another side of the wall where you’re playing on that moment. :-P But however, I will rate it. You get from me a… 6.5! If you work more on eyecandy, could improve your rating.
Whee. time to view the highest rated treasure level on j2o. Firstly, glad you included the help thing, since people dont have to spend forever looking for secrets/hints (although sometimes that is a good timewaster =P).
Layout/Gameplay: Its pretty good, the level is fairly large, although there are lots of crowded passages and open dead ends. I like the warps at 36,22 (or similar) and 79, 22 (or similar). Im not too fond of the crate breaking thing since it leads to campers and stuff, and I’d usually break the crate at the start or something, but whatever. Layout is alright. Gameplay is pretty good, the level being underwater is a rux idea.
Placement of stuff: Gems are placed nicely, scattered throughout the level. Ammo was a bit sparce and food was even sparcer. I got around 198 gems (wow O.o) in the level, which is a pretty huge amount (i also might’ve missed some, who knows), but this level is meant for many people. Overall, things are a bit sparce(aside from gems),and the gem placement is good.
Eyecandy: Looking at it, some things are a bit confusing and some look out of place, but you did what you could I guess, and having eyecandy is better than no eyecandy. There is a significant amount of it, but it didnt really surprise me in any unique way. All around it was decent.
Overall (not an average): Its a good treasure level, although not much about it is really new. I would definately play this, and you did a good job on it, but the rating Im giving this probably wont be so high because its not too original.
Layout/Gameplay: 8.5
Placement of Stuff: 8.5
Eyecandy: 8
Overall (not an average): 7.9
Final Rating comes down to: 8.225, coming down to an 8.2. Great level, you should make more treasure levels in the future since most levels uploaded are either SP, Battle or CTF. Definite download reccomendation, and good job on winning the Golden Carrot award (although that was a long while ago ;P).
R3ptile, you can see the background I used in the example level several times. In the level there are occasional “splits” in the bricks where you can see layer 8 through them. Also, putting the black tiles in layer 8 would make it so they were all unmasked, and would possibly mess up the level. Feel free to look at my level in JCS if you need help; there’s no password.
Yes, I wanna ask the same: What is this stuff makes?
why is the zip file called nickhopper, isn’t that a jazzer?
Well nickhopper, why do u have 2 users[This review has been edited by Sabaspaz]
why the tile-set need masks?
The expample level isnt good at all but o.k.
Not very much tiles, but i think its still enough, i miss the eyecandy tiles and more the mario swing…
no masks!!
6.5![This review has been edited by lutijn]
Better then before.
Mayb its a bit small but ok.
First of all : 2 carrots is ok, but not on the same 10 tiles =(
But it isnt very bad at all, funny battle game but it isnt not too big.
Gameplay is ok, i rate this an 6.8 = 6.7
Hmm doesnt it haves much ammo?
i’m nickhopper[This review has been edited by lutijn]
Argh. I had this level for two years now and never got to reviewing it. Here goes:
Firstly, I loved the eyecandy in the far right back then and thought it was awesome (even though looking at it now I find it a tad confusing). 121,58, I kept getting stuck there when I swam up for some reason =\. Im not too fond of chat places but this one is alright since you’re underwater and cant stomp/kick. The eyecandy ranges from astounding to just about average through the level, but in most places its pretty good. The layout is alright, but there are a few places you can get stuck/almost stuck, and a few dead ends/pointless circles which Im not too fond of. The top of the level is a tad dull because there is no backround eyecandy. Pickup placement is alright in most areas. Music is awesome. Gameplay is a bit bumpy and in some places there are parts that slow you down (39,41 and 78,43) where one ways where needed. Right now I’d rate this about an 8-8.2, but looking back at what I would’ve rated this when I downloaded I probably would’ve given it 9-9.2. So Im giving it an 8.7. Download reccomended.
Whoa! Another review to ruxxoring song, which has to be renewed…
Technoir in a great style. That’s describe of this tune in five words. How Joeph Collins said, this is how Technoir has to be.
Samples are good, they are very well fitting into the song, sound quality of them is good enough. Rhythm is stable beat – hi-hat – snare – hi-hat, and it perfectly fits into tune.
All details in song like quiet melody playing after orchestra hits or 2:36 make this song just great.
(+) Technoir in great style
(-) Nothing more
Now, forget to original Technoir. This is better than original in all ways. Not much original stuff, it’s just original improved by 200 %. Use it in your levels, in your mp3players. And use loud speakers.
Youmamas fight room is not your lvl !
Youmamas tree top room is not your
lvl !
too Small
Bad Ammo
no team (ctf) start pos !
MORE AMMO AND MORE GOODIES!
THE MAP IS FUNY
Woah RUXOR, two thongs up!
(Unsupported rating removal. Most people seem to disagree with you – could you expand on your reasons for giving this rating? How can you get such a high rating from this upload? Original rating 9.0 (I need to remember to include that more often). ~Violet)[This review has been edited by Violet CLM]
Well include it then. =P
Jazz2Online © 1999-INFINITY (Site Credits). We have a Privacy Policy. Jazz Jackrabbit, Jazz Jackrabbit 2, Jazz Jackrabbit Advance and all related trademarks and media are ™ and © Epic Games. Lori Jackrabbit is © Dean Dodrill. J2O development powered by Loops of Fury and Chemical Beats.
Eat your lima beans, Johnny.