Jazz Jackrabbit 2 Online

(old review removed, replaced with new system)
STORY: None.
Pros: None.
Cons: None.
Rating: 1.0

TILESET/TILESET USE: Very poor. It consists of the author’s name for the background, some bricks, and a malfunctioning fire animation.
Pros: The author used an animation, however poor.
Cons: Nothing interesting, animation done badly.
Rating: 1.2

WEAPON/ITEM/ENEMY PLACEMENT: The level is mostly a bunch of float lizards. Another enemy might have been a better idea, as the float lizards get shot down and walk around at the bottom of the level, harmless. No weapons or items.
Pros: The enemies have the effect intended.
Cons: Not the best enemy chosen, no weapons or items.
Rating: 2.0

ORIGINALITY: Kind of original. The idea is to stay alive while shooting destruct scenery blocks. Think the queen boss, only different.
Pros: Makes for an interesting gameplay.
Cons: Not too original. Feels kind of like a rehash of the Deckstar boss from JJ1.
Rating: 1.7

DIFFICULTY: A bit hard until you get the trick of it (shooting the enemies down, and just stomping on one to get back to the block height)
Pros: Difficult at first.
Cons: Too difficult at first.
Rating: 1.2

REPLAY VALUE: You probably won’t want to play this ever again, assuming you don’t delete it. Unless you like the idea, make a level like it, and check this for research purposes.
Pros: Not applicable.
Cons: Not applicable.
Rating: 1.2

OVERALL (Not an average): Did I mention there’s no way to end the level? The end area events are on the far right side of the level. Apparently the author never beat this, or he’d have known about it.
Pros: Slightly original, kind of hard.
Cons: Rather poor idea execution.
Rating: 1.5[This review has been edited by Violet CLM]

SOME Good art work:+ 2.0
No exemple level!: 0.5
You’re new!:+0.5

Overall rating: 2.2

(Rating removal. -Trafton)[This review has been edited by Trafton AT]

Speaks for itselves….

(Rating removal. It may seem to you that since you are already banned you are at no obligation to follow the rules. This is not true. -Trafton)[This review has been edited by Trafton AT]

WoW! Good for your first, second, tileset! Very good.

I like this. FuN pictures, All right tileset…

Eyecandy: Yap, that’s not good. Eerhm.. let we say a bit ugly pictures. And the bacground is 1 tile-blue, Yuck! All things are mirrored or rotated, but who cares..
Animation: WoW! Many! That rulez. FuN for JJ2!
Overall: Nicy tileset, for newbies (No bad term). Download? For the guys and chicks that like this Funny/Looney things.

this is a verry little lvl
but good backround but bad tiles for layer 5 and no wapons and eyecandy
i give a 4.2

Better then the first tileset
but not very good, try making more shadows. overall, it’s weird…[This review has been edited by _Jaws]

I’m afraid I don’t really like this…

It needs more real enemies, there’s too much blood and the background is bad.

I would not recommend this, Sorry, Toby.[This review has been edited by _Jaws]

If this is CraccoBoy´s tileset, don´t you think he already used that idea? He wouldn´t put tiles in his tileset he doesn´t need for a level or concept.

Yep, you surely put some effort into this one.. The third version is definately the best. I like the way you improved the big ghost, and I like the new textured backgrounds as well, such as the new layer 6/7 tiles at the bottom. Come on, hurry with CW, CY and CZ now ;P

The tileset is very nice but has no much extra Tiles. You could look at the Standard Tilesets Mezo3a & Mezo3b for example to put some extra things in your Tileset, because it misses much stuff which makes levels boring with out. And o yeah Its nice that there is a Textured background and Mountains. Well a 7.7.

Why you should get the credit? Didnt Violet said ppl already did this before.

Two single player levels by my fellow terran Unhit. At least, I hope he is.

The first one uses Carrotus, has almost as many goodies as a level made by Blade (I could be wrong.. I haven’t seen one in a while), and has several birds. There are some interesting parts, but it’s really too easy.
The second one, using Medivo, is about the same, only it’s harder.
The eyecandy is fine, although in Medivo the rain (from what I can tell) is in a foreground layer, so it rains inside of the castle.
Basically, you go around, collect the goodies, shoot the occasional enemy, and avoid the various spikes/thorns (that don’t always hurt).

I would give it worse, but you’re new! Anyway:

Levels: +1.0
Tileset: +1.9
Very funny: +1.5
You’re new! +0.1

Edit: Hey, 007! Don’t edit my review!

Overall: 4.5[This review has been edited by 007][This review has been edited by Elliot]

Answer to Violet’s post:

1.The tail is often the weakness to these kinds of monsters.

2.I wanted missiles, but it screwed up.

3.This is only an EXAMPLE. I didn’t make it into a real level. If that’s what YOU want to fix when YOU make a level like this, then feel free to do so as long as I get credit.

Well, the idea is an old rehashed thing that has been done before. There, from what I can tell, are three differences.
1: Instead of just shooting at it, you have to go around back and attack the tail. No, I agree, that doesn’t make sense.
2: Instead of shooting animated fire balls or something that effect you, it uses the Ice SCE. Half the time the shots go the wrong direction, and they don’t hurt you anyway.
3: It doesn’t work. Actually, this might have not been made to work in previous incarnations, but I think it really stands out that his example doesn’t even work. Sure, you can destroy Tweedle, but it doesn’t help. It doesn’t go to the next level or anything.

So far, I’m undecided on a rating. I’ll come back to this a little later.

Edit: If the thing I want to change is to make it work? :P[This review has been edited by Violet CLM]

isn’t rating your own level forbidden???

The following things are forbidden at J2O, persistently breaking the rules may result in banishment from the site:

1. Rating one’s own levels.

2. Rating levels obviously unfair(give a level with an average rating of 2, a 10, or one with an average rating of 10, a 2, or something like that. (try not to rate your own friend’s levels in a biased way)

3. Using multiple accounts to influence the rating

[This review has been edited by Atlas]

Any day now, somebody will rate this. Meanwhile, I’ll just give it a 10.;-P[This review has been edited by BlackRabite]

[Giving your own level a rating is forbidden on this site. You should know that. -FQuist][This review has been edited by Fquist]

“But it was meant to feature some fast play.”
Well ok I wont rate the level about his bigness. The Tileset of the level is very nice, by Disguise. The level uses the Tileset very good. The tiles are connected great to each other. Eyecandy is not so much around. There are tiles for more eyecandy, but since that doesnts really matter if you are playing in a small level. Ammo is placed nice around. There are some bugs where you can get easy stuck, 63,29 – 63,30. Well I wont discuss much more, since you are a J2LC, you know much more then me about making lvls >.<
But making a bit the lvl larger would get maybe a eight. Anyway its nice for a Instagib lvl. A 7.5. Well done.

Xan…? Eeeh no matter.

The idea is nice, although I have to admit that I think this can be done way better.